Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville — 2014 Budget <br />Debt Service includes the principal and interest paid on bonds used to finance infrastructure and facility <br />improvement projects. A significant increase is expected in 2014, due to the issuance of additional <br />bonds used to finance the Park Renewal program. <br />TIF Pay -as- you -Go refers to tax increment paid to developers as specified in Tax Increment Financing <br />(TIF) agreements between the City and various developers. Two additional TIF Districts have been <br />created in the past couple of years which will increase the amount of TIF paid to developers. <br />Budget Funding Sources <br />The following graph and table summarizes the funding sources for the Budget. <br />2014 Funding Sources <br />■ Property Taxes <br />Special Assessments <br />Intergovernmental <br />■ Licenses & Permits <br />Charges for Services <br />Court Fines <br />Interest Earnings <br />■ Other Revenues <br />■ Use of Reserves <br />$ Increase <br />% Increase <br />Funding Source <br />2013 <br />2014 <br />(Decrease) <br />(Decrease) <br />Property Taxes <br />$ 1712691826 <br />$ 18,003,721 <br />$ 733,895 <br />4.2% <br />Special Assessments <br />1501000 <br />1531000 <br />3,000 <br />2.0% <br />Intergovernmental <br />219851518 <br />3,467,811 <br />482,293 <br />16.2% <br />Licenses & Permits <br />215121681 <br />2,8981700 <br />3 86,019 <br />15.4% <br />Charges for Services <br />1817471981 <br />22,3001065 <br />3,552,084 <br />18.9% <br />Court Fines <br />2201000 <br />2401000 <br />20,000 <br />9.1% <br />Interest Earnings <br />8561839 <br />4111800 <br />(445,039) <br />-51.9% <br />Other Revenues <br />116291361 <br />117111509 <br />821148 <br />5.0% <br />Use of Reserves ** <br />110621804 <br />1,5071954 <br />4451150 <br />41.9% <br />Total <br />$ 45,435,010 <br />$ 5016941560 <br />$ 5,259,550 <br />11.6% <br />* * Represents planned spending <br />from capital <br />replacement funds <br />Property Taxes include taxes levied against taxable property. The increase in property taxes is largely <br />attributable to the higher debt service costs associated with the bonds used to finance the Park Renewal <br />program. An increase was also necessary to strengthen the City's asset replacement funding <br />mechanisms, and to offset inflationary impacts. <br />V/ <br />