My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0224
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0224
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2014 10:20:12 AM
Creation date
3/26/2014 3:31:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/24/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 24, 2014 <br /> Page 19 <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that communication had been put out on the City's website <br /> as well as other means to alert residents that they should pay attention to the tem- <br /> perature of their cold water, and if below 35 degrees, start a small stream of water <br /> continuously running until temperatures are higher. Depending on the volume of <br /> the water running, Mr. Schwartz estimated that this could cost homeowners an <br /> additional $10 to $25 per month. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that his research and survey of other cities and how they <br /> handle these costs indicated a wide variance: leaving residents on their own, taken <br /> care of by the City(e.g. City of Bloomington), all thawing done at city cost, a flat <br /> fee charged by the City to thaw lines (e.g. White Bear Lake at a $250 flat fee). <br /> However, Mr. Schwartz noted that these current conditions are extraordinary, but <br /> are forecast to continue for another week or more. <br /> Mr. Schwartz highlighted the issues needing consideration by the City Council <br /> tonight: <br /> • Whether or not to bill residents all or partial costs; <br /> • Whether or not to credit water usage as seen in recent newspaper articles as <br /> being done by some cities; <br /> • Recognize that cost per service line could range from $300 to $2,000 or more <br /> per line depending on the effort expended, with the average probably closer to <br /> $800 to $900 to thaw; and <br /> • For those the City could not get back into service, what was the option — to <br /> hook up to neighbors or a fire hydrant, but still requiring water usage to keep <br /> the line functioning. <br /> Mr. Schwartz asked that Councilmembers discuss the best approach and how to <br /> respond to this unusual circumstance. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that he would be willing to do what was possible <br /> to forego water expenses for those having issues and running taps to prevent the <br /> line from freezing. Councilmember Willmus noted that his major concern was <br /> the City being an intermediary in hiring a firm or bringing a firm in to hook up a <br /> welder, opining that he thought that being in that position should be avoided if at <br /> all possible. Councilmember Willmus suggested that the City could provide con- <br /> tact information for those firms providing that type of service, but the City's role <br /> should not extend beyond that information. Councilmember Willmus opined that <br /> he was willing to forgive charges for those running a stream of water to avoid <br /> freeze-ups. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Councilmember Willmus confirmed that his con- <br /> cern was the liability risk for the City in serving as an intermediary. <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed concern with insurance, and if the freeze-up <br /> was in the line under the street, opined that it was the City's responsibility to pro- <br /> vide water service. While nature had given everyone a nasty hand this year, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.