Laserfiche WebLink
options of this pedestrian facility and its separation from general traffic lanes; <br /> work plan with the majority of the work conducted by City staff and subsequent <br /> hiring of a paving contractor as applicable; costs for storm water features and any <br /> required soil or landscaping materials and drainage mitigation as part of the <br /> project; and tying the project in with other trail rehabilitation projects in 2014 to <br /> obtain further cost efficiencies. <br /> Mr. Culver reviewed specifics of the intersection at Cleveland Avenue and <br /> County Road B; and coordination with the County in turnback of the roadway <br /> from the County to the City, hopefully within a few months and prior to this <br /> project; and work with the State for signal controls under their jurisdiction for <br /> correction of issues and extending the left turn arrow. <br /> Mr. Culver noted that a number of ideas and minor issues brought forward by <br /> residents during discussions had been addressed, and had proven valid <br /> considerations. Mr. Culver noted that parking would be restricted on the south <br /> side, which would unfortunately impact several homes on the south side of the <br /> street and location of their mailboxes. Mr. Culver advised that the City Council <br /> had approved installing a sidewalk in that area—between Fairways and Fulham — <br /> at an additional cost estimate of $20,000 to $25,000, pending additional survey <br /> data this spring as details are finalized and drainage issues further reviewed. <br /> At the request of Member Gjerdingen, Mr. Culver confirmed that the sidewalk <br /> would be concrete. <br /> Mr. Culver reviewed subsequent long-term reconstruction of County Road B in <br /> approximately ten (10) years and additional design work with the neighborhood at <br /> that time on features, once it is determined if the roadway will be of urban or rural <br /> design. Mr. Culver advised that, at that time, a more traditional pedestrian facility <br /> will be installed, most likely behind a raised curb and gutter if of urban design, <br /> with pros and cons for both types of design. However, Mr. Culver noted that a <br /> significant consideration will be development of sustainable drainage as the City <br /> works with the Watershed District as part of that future reconstruction. <br /> At the request of Chair Vanderwall, Mr. Culver confirmed that those plans may <br /> include rain gardens with rain water captured in some type of water treatment <br /> system for potential re-use as irrigation as part of the long range improvements of <br /> the roadway; which will also dictate whether or not the sidewalk portion of this <br /> short-term project will be salvageable or not as that long-term design develops. <br /> Discussion included preferable north or south side for the long-term pedestrian <br /> facility based on a number of factors, variables, safety issues, and challenges. <br /> Chair Vanderwall noted the difficulties in snow removal along this segment with <br /> the varying types of sidewalk and pathway; and opined that homeowners may <br /> Page 5 of 13 <br />