Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,March 3, 2014 <br /> Page 4 <br /> e. Approve Local Consent to the Knights of Columbus for their Consumption <br /> and Display of Intoxication Liquor Permit <br /> McGehee moved, Etten seconded, approval of the request by the Knights of Co- <br /> lumbus for local consent of a permit for their proposed Columbus Consumption <br /> and Display of Intoxicating Liquor at 2233 North Hamline, Suite B-12; from the <br /> period of April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Laliberte; McGehee; Wilimus; Etten; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> 8. Consider Items Removed from Consent <br /> d. Award Contract for 2014 Sanitary Sewer Lining <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, City Manager Trudgeon provided a summary of the <br /> request as detailed in the Request for Council Action(RCA) dated March 3, 2014. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned if this project was for the purpose of lining <br /> mains and not connecting stubs; opining that often those stubs are the problem ar- <br /> eas for failures, and further opining that a better job could be done in protecting <br /> this investment if those areas were also lined. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Public Works Director Duane Schwartz advised <br /> that those connections, known as service laterals, and private, were not currently <br /> included in the City's lining projects, as the technology was still maturing to ad- <br /> dress those connections points by lining them. Mr. Schwartz noted that the tech- <br /> nology for lining mains has matured well and had become more cost-effective, <br /> with costs less to line them than to dig them up. Mr. Schwartz agreed that often a <br /> failure was found in the connection point between the main and lateral. However, <br /> under current City of Roseville policy, the City is responsible for the main, and <br /> private property owners for the laterals. While technology does exist now to line <br /> the entire service or a few feet into the service line providing a water tight con- <br /> nection with the main, Mr. Schwartz advised that it would typically only be finan- <br /> cial feasible as part of a large scale project, done by an entirely different contrac- <br /> tor with different technologies, and currently costing between $3,000 and $5,000 <br /> per lateral lining application. Mr. Schwartz noted that the lining could be done <br /> any time after the service is installed. Mr. Schwartz further noted that the City's <br /> current twenty-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was not funded to carry <br /> out such an extensive lining project as currently written. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that the discussion held at last week's Council meeting <br /> about ownership of private utilities in public rights-of-way addressed some of the <br /> issues currently being considered regarding laterals, but was not part of this re- <br /> quest. <br />