My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0310
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0310
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2014 2:35:00 PM
Creation date
3/27/2014 2:34:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/10/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,March 10, 2014 <br /> Page 11 <br /> Mayor Roe advised that the protocol for tonight's meeting would be for the City <br /> Council to ask questions of staff or seek clarification of any specifics; then to <br /> open the meeting for public comment; and then for the City Council to further <br /> discuss the issues and provide direction to staff; with no formal action intended <br /> for tonight's meeting, simply providing direction to staff. <br /> Prior to any final action, Councilmember Willmus asked that staff provide a red- <br /> line copy of current ordinance and proposed revisions. <br /> Councilmember Willmus' questions and comments were related to whether a re- <br /> quirement that any RV's parked on the street be hooked to a vehicle would affect <br /> the reading of the current ordinance; current ordinance that if a trailer was hooked <br /> to a vehicle within the twenty-foot setback it was parked illegally and would be <br /> noticed for removal or moving within seven days; potential impacts of a provision <br /> that none of the items could be parked within fifteen feet of the curb or not en- <br /> croach into the City right-of-way, and any variations of that distance; site line <br /> concerns for trailers, RV's and boats versus trees and vegetation in that same area; <br /> current lack of restrictions for setbacks for trailer or boat parking and potential for <br /> their location right up to the property line, with some cities having a 5' setback <br /> and his preference to avoid parking on property lines and creating additional <br /> complaints; and how to define these items versus nuisance issues and outside <br /> storage issues for abatement. <br /> Councilmember McGehee's questions and comments were related to defining this <br /> equipment versus using them for outside storage unless enclosed and locked, and <br /> kept clean an tidy providing for well-maintained trailers; current parking require- <br /> ments for RV's and trailers on grass, with motorized vehicles required to be <br /> parked on concrete or asphalt; short-term and long-term parking and impacts to <br /> the neighborhood based on current regulations limiting front yard storage for 3 <br /> days before moving items to the side or rear yards; those items that can and can- <br /> not be addressed by staff; and her concern that trailers be well-maintained and <br /> setback issues addressed regarding operational RV's; and her lack of support for <br /> requiring their attachment to a motor vehicle if blocks were properly installed. <br /> Councilmember Etten's questions and comments were related to his concerns <br /> about abuses by those simply moving an RV or trailer a few feet to meet the re- <br /> quirements of the 72 hours, and lack of enforcement ability for staff, suggesting <br /> other solutions and options; concerns with parking those items in front of some- <br /> one else's property and generation of additional complaints; and how to address <br /> the problem equipment versus those who are responsible citizens and neighbors, <br /> especially in those areas where a traffic and/or safety issue was evident. <br /> General discussion included types of utility trailers and/or campers and how to <br /> address their specific storage needs and neighborhood impacts based on the num- <br /> ber of axles or how they were licensed; whether a city-wide elimination of on- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.