My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0407_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0407_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 11:13:39 AM
Creation date
4/3/2014 2:17:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Accomplishments: <br />• To date have closed 93% of the 376 cases opened in 2013: <br />o Cooperation from the public on correcting public nuisances remains very positive. <br />0 89 % of residents have complied with simple letter requests for compliance. <br />• Staff includes with initial notices an informational brochure to educate residents about common public <br />nuisance violations; an effort to minimize violations through education and cooperation. Also, when a <br />violation is a building maintenance issue, staff includes additional HRA and HRC Program information. <br />• Fewer public nuisance complaints from the public were received in 2013 (376 in 2013 versus 487 in 2012). <br />Also, fewer Accelerated Abatements and Council Approved Abatements occurred in 2013 (9 in 2013 <br />versus 37 in 2012). This appears to indicate the Land Use Enforcement Program (complaints) and the <br />Neighborhood Enhancement Program are having a positive effect in reducing the numbers of public <br />nuisances negatively affecting the City. Hopefully this trend continues. <br />� Staff improves procedures each year through realignment of staff duties and streamlining staff procedures. <br />Observations• <br />• Still observing where one public nuisance tends to promote more of the same - a clustering effect. <br />� Still observing more violations in neighborhoods of older homes; this is to be expected due to typically <br />smaller lots, smaller garages and older construction. <br />Some property maintenance cases remain difficult to resolve due to financiaUphysical hardship by the <br />property owner. Many of the unresolved `pending' cases are of this type. <br />2013 Code Enforcement Report <br />Land Use Cases Ending December 31, 2013 <br />Case Counts by Month <br />Type Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TOTAL <br />Snow 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 36 <br />Business 0 2 4 0 2 0 4 3 0 1 4 3 23 <br />Vehicles 0 6 2 3 0 4 4 3 5 4 3 8 42 <br />Debris 1 0 0 2 9 7 6 7 6 7 0 1 46 <br />Outside Storage 5 0 0 4 8 7 8 4 12 6 2 4 60 <br />Property Maint. 0 2 0 2 8 2 6 5 6 4 2 0 37 <br />Residential 8 8 4 1 7 8 9 4 5 7 4 3 68 <br />Grass 0 0 0 0 7 26 18 9 4 0 0 0 64 <br />TOTAL 28 27 10 12 41 54 55 35 38 29 15 32 376 <br />Cases Opened/Closed by Month <br />Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec TOTAL <br />Opened 28 27 10 12 41 54 55 35 38 29 15 32 376 <br />Closed 27 26 9 11 41 52 53 31 34 26 11 26 347 <br />Problem Cases — 2009-2013 <br />2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 <br />Administrative Tickets 12 10 0 0 0 <br />Accelerated Abatements ( Grass/Snow/Graffiti) 47 40 38 30 5 <br />Abatements Approved by Council 12 16 12 7 3 <br />Council A roved Citations 7 2 2 0 1 <br />TOTAL 78 68 52 37 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.