pf_02993B - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

120 - 150 apartment/condominium residential units are established in one contiguous development along the east edge of City Square and fronting onto Lexington Avenue. The ground floor of the residential, along City Square would be reserved for service conunercial uses. Parking for the residential would be in the basement level under the units. Access to this parking would be directly from Lexington Avenue. All other components remain the same as described in Development Option B described above; City Hall Expansion, Conununity Center, Recreation Center, Indoor Pool, Residential, Parking Structure, Parking Ramp, Surface Parking Option B Master Plan Option B (Exhibit N) is the same as Development Option C described above, except for the elimination of the "wintergarden". A smallcr enclosed connection is proposed be the community center and city hall. A small enclosed gathering space is part of this connection and as part of the connection to Central Park from the City Center. Option B also illustrates a one level parking ramp over the existing Ice Arena surface parking lot, to ensure adequate adjoining parking for the recreation center, indoor pool, Ice Arena and John Rose OvaL Other components of Master Plan Option B remain the same as Development Option C; City Halt, Ice Arena Complex, Community Center, Recreation Center, Indoor Pool, Public Safety Building, Parking Structure, Parking Ramp, Surface Parking. Implementation Strategy The implementation strategy chart for Roseville City Center (Exhibit BB) identifies each major project proposed in Master Plan Options A and B and their size, cost, time frame, implementation, partnership and next steps. Each Option has been divided into five phases or stages of development. The phases/stages do not necessarily need to occur in order. Some may occur at the same time and others may want to be implemented sooner due to public interest, private sector interest, or need. A plan has been prepared for each phase or stage of the process to illustrate the potential evolution of the project. As has been discussed earlier, the Public Works facility should be relocated before any new dcvelopment of the City Center occurs. Minor improvements could be made before the Public Work garage is relocated, but they would only be disrupted when it is moved. Option B illustrates temporary parking in place of the City Square in Phases/Stages 1 through 3, prior to construction of the new public safety building and parking structure. Conclusions, Recommendations and Next Steps The City Center Task Force has concluded that Master Plan Options A and B provide to viable alternatives for consideration by Roseville Planning Commission and City Council. Both options establish a new City Square as a new public gathering place and as a focus for a new Community Center, Recreation Center and expanded City Govenunent Center. Option A includes the potential for introducing residential development that could help to offset public sector RoseviII e City Center Master Plan and Development Strategy 4 Draft 11.10.99