Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, February 18, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />1 <br />limit to make the body consistent with advisory commissions to the City Council. Member Masche <br />2 <br />opined that, based on the Mayor’s criteria, that office could make an appropriate decision for the HRA <br />3 <br />Board. Regarding the concerns raised about having sufficient institutional or corporate memory in <br />4 <br />place for current projects being undertaken, Member Masche opined that there was enough consistency <br />5 <br />on staff to address those concerns. Based on past turnover occurring on the HRA Board, Member <br />6 <br />Masche stated that his position was to not limit HRA terms. <br />7 <br />8 <br />Member Etten provided the City Council’s perspective, recognizing that other commissions functioned <br />9 <br />differently. Member Etten advised that the purpose of term limits was to engage more people in the <br />10 <br />function of government in Roseville; and since the HRA is a non-elected body, the goal was to have <br />11 <br />more turnovers to get more people involved. Member Etten noted that the proposal from the Mayor and <br />12 <br />City Council was to have two (2), five (5) year terms with a total term of ten (10) years. Member Etten <br />13 <br />opined that this would still provide sufficient institutional memory while allowing for renewal and <br />14 <br />rejuvenation of the HRA Board, especially with the staff support provided to the HRA Board and also <br />15 <br />providing that institutional memory. Member Etten further opined that being able to set a levy was not <br />16 <br />the same as engaging in the legwork performed by other commissions; and opined that the HRA Board <br />17 <br />would still function well without having 15-20 year term limits. Without attempting to speak for Mayor <br />18 <br />Roe, Member Etten suggested this was his rationale in seeking a reduction in term limits from three (3) <br />19 <br />to two (2). <br />20 <br />21 <br />Member Elkins recognized both points of view, but stated she need to give it more consideration before <br />22 <br />making a decision. <br />23 <br />24 <br />Acting Chair Majerus expressed his concern with so few HRA Board members available tonight for a <br />25 <br />full discussion, and suggested postponing a decision until the April meeting. <br />26 <br />27 <br />Member Elkins withdrew her motion. <br />28 <br />29 <br />Motion: Member Etten moved, seconded by Member Masche to TABLE action on this item until <br />30 <br />the April 2014 regular meeting of the HRA Board. <br />31 <br />32 <br />Ayes: 4 <br />33 <br />Nays: 0 <br />34 <br />Motion carried. <br />35 <br />36 <br />6.Consent Agenda <br />37 <br />Acting Executive Director Kelsey briefly reviewed the one Consent Agenda item; as detailed in the <br />38 <br />staff report and attachments dated February 18, 2014. <br />39 <br />40 <br />a.Acceptance of Housing Resource Center (HRC) Monthly Report for January 2014 <br />41 <br />42 <br />Motion: Member Elkins moved, seconded by Member Etten to approve the Consent <br />43 <br />Agenda as presented. <br />44 <br />45 <br />Ayes: 4 <br />46 <br />Nays: 0 <br />47 <br />Motion carried. <br />48 <br />49 <br />8. Presentations (continued) <br />50 <br />51 <br />a.Update on Dale Fire Station Redevelopment – GreaterHousingCorporation <br /> Metropolitan <br />52 <br />(GMHC) <br />53 <br />Ms. Kelsey introduced the GMHC development team for the Dale Street Project: Ms. Eden <br />54 <br />Spencer; Bill Buelow; Todd Rhoades; and Emily Timm. <br />55 <br /> <br />