Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting <br />of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, <br />Minnesota was duly held on the day of , 1990, at 7:30 <br />.m. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />members were present: <br />and the following were absent. <br /> <br />moved that the following resolution be <br /> <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br /> <br />WHERBAS, Richard Kettler/Mel Buesseler filed an application <br />to rezone a lot at 1023 Parker Avenue from R-l to R-2. <br /> <br />WHEREAS. R-l and R-2 zoning districts are distinct uses each <br />with t~~ir own permitted uses clearly Bet out in the zoning code. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the zoning code, whic~ makes a distinction between <br />R-l and R·2 districts would be meaninqless if R-2 uses were <br />regularly used in R-l districts. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, R-2 zoning districts provide a qood transitional <br />use separating R-I zoninq districts from other dietricts which <br />allow more intense uses. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the application to rezone 1023 Parker Avenue could <br />result 1n co-mingling R-l anð R-2 uses and if such a policy were <br />followed it would render the clear distinction between R-I ðnd <br />R-2 districts meaningless. In would make all R-l districts, in <br />effect, R-2 districts. <br /> <br />. WHEREAS, the application to rezone 1023 Parker does not <br />qualify as transitional use separating R-l from other di·str1cts. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, by the City Council of the <br />City of Roseville as follows: <br /> <br />1. The application to rezone a lot at 1023 Parker Avenue <br />from R-l to R-2 is denied. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resoÌution w~~. <br />duly seconded by member and upon a vote beinq <br />taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />, and the <br /> <br />following voted against the same: <br />