Laserfiche WebLink
impacted or be perceived to be impacted in the future. Mr. Paschke opined that he found it to be <br />more based on a particular instance as part of the review process, and should be considered for <br />resolution at that time; with the City Attorney and City Council participating in those discussions <br />and evaluations; and as clarification is indicated. <br />Chair Gisselquist encouraged individual commissioners to bring forward any issues they found in <br />either document. <br />Chair Gisselquist closed Public Hearing at approximately 8:07 p.m.; with no one appearing for or <br />against. <br />This case is scheduled for consideration by the City Council on April 21, 2014. <br />MOTION <br />Member Murphy moved, seconded by Member Cunningham to recommend to the City <br />Council APPROVAL of the TEXT AMENDMENTS to Chapter 4, Land Use of the <br />Comprehensive Plan and Section 1005.07.A, Statement of Purpose, of the Zoning <br />Ordinance, as provided in Section 6 of the staff report dated April 10, 2014. <br />Member Murphy spoke in support of any efforts to remove ambiguities. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />