Laserfiche WebLink
126 and approves those plans and specifications, it needed to monitor and follow -up <br />127 with the contractor and /or subcontractors on frequent inspections to avoid those <br />128 vendors from being tempted to cut some corners and install water service at 6' <br />129 versus the proscribed 8' as specified. Member DeBenedet questioned why a <br />130 property owner should be responsible for that situation, when they had nothing to <br />131 do with the system's design or inspection process, opining that therefore the onus <br />132 was not on the property owner. <br />133 <br />164 Discussion among staff and commissioners included how to prove underground <br />165 storage facilities were being maintained and cleaned out as applicable as <br />166 diminishing capacity was indicated with potential revoking of credits unless <br />167 mitigation efforts were forthcoming; preferred annual inspection of any property <br />168 receiving credits, whether by staff or engineers as applicable and depending on <br />169 the type of system (e.g. rain garden, pond, or underground infiltration system); <br />170 confined space entry requirements for inspection of underground systems; <br />171 whether citizen - driven complaints would initiate more frequent inspections than <br />Page 4 of 14 <br />