My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02182
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2100
>
pf_02182
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:43:10 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 10:43:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2182
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
5000 LEXINGTON AVE N
Applicant
AMOCO OIL CO.
Status
WITHDRWN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />w <br /> <br />BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. <br /> <br />TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS <br />7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500 I EDINA, MN 554391 (612) 832-98581 FAX (612) 832-9564 <br /> <br />February 13, 1992 <br /> <br />REFERTO FILE: <br /> <br />91-54 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: Kris Kristufek <br /> <br />FROM: Jon Wertje~ Jim Benshoof <br /> <br />RE: Traffic Study for the Proposed Amoco Development in Roseville <br /> <br />This memorandom presents our traffic impact analysis for the porposed Amoco <br />development in the City of Roseville, Minnesota. The project site is located east of <br />Lexington Avenue (CSAH 51) just north of T.H. 36, as shown in Figure 1. The <br />proposed Amoco development includes eight gas pump spaces, 1248 square foot <br />convenience store and a 792 square foot car wash. The proposed site plan is illustrated <br />in Figure 2. . <br /> <br />The major purpose of our analysis was to develop a traffic plan for the Amoco <br />development which would provide safe and effective traffic operations both on and off <br />the site. After our review of the preliminary site plan, we indicated some traffic <br />concerns regarding the concept of a direct full access driveway to Lexington Avenue <br />just north of the T.H. 36 westbound ramp intersection. The traffic issues included <br />spacing to the T.H. 36 westbound ramp intersection and left turn conflicts. Due to <br />these two traffic issues, we have recommended the extension of the Lexington A venue <br />median island north of the site driveway as shown in Figure 2. The shared PUD access <br />drive would retain its full access movements to/from Lexington Avenue. This median <br />island extension, which has been included in the current proposed site plan, has been <br />assumed for our traffic study analyses. The tasks to accomplish this traffic study <br />included data collection, development of traffic forecasts, traffic analyses, and <br />development of conclusions and recommendations. The conclusions and <br />recommendations are discussed next, followed by the other tasks. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.