My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02197
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2100
>
pf_02197
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:43:45 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 10:44:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2197
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2975 LONG LAKE RD
Applicant
BRANDT, GEORGE C. INC.
PIN
052923240006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />8 May 1991 <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: <br /> <br />2197 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />George C. Brandt, Inc. <br /> <br />LOCATION: <br /> <br />2975 Long Lake Road (see <br />sketch) <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> <br />variance <br />Ordinance <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />zoning <br /> <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />As you may recall, this was an application at the March 13 <br />Planning commission meeting for an "after the fact" sign <br />variance to approve the location where the applicants have <br />already installed their sign. Since an accurate site plan <br />was not submitted, we considered the application <br />incomplete. Nevertheless, it was our opinion, based on <br />the information we had, that a variance was not <br />justified. <br /> <br />Mr. Brandt did not attend the Planning commission meeting, <br />but the variance request was denied and passed on to the <br />City Council at their March 25 meeting. Mr. Brandt <br />appeared before the Council. The Council agreed that a <br />complete site plan is needed before the application was <br />reviewed. They gave Mr. Brandt the option of either <br />having his current application denied, or returning to the <br />Planning commissin with a site plan and appropriate <br />information to support his assertion of a visibility <br />hardship. He agreed to this, and the item was referred <br />back to the Planning commission. <br /> <br />In the meantime, City Staff has met with Mr. Brandt asking <br />him to supply us with more detailed information to support <br />the variance. He expressed uncertainty as to how to <br />prepare an accurate site plan and other information, so we <br />offered to assist him in gathering the necessary <br />materials. We suggested he take photographs at measured <br />locations on Long Lake Road so that accurate site lines <br />could be drawn on a map. This he did, but the photos were <br />taken from the curb line, therefore they did not <br />accurately represent the view a driver would have from the <br />street. <br /> <br />We went to the site and took additional photographs to <br />assist Mr. Brandt in visualizing the situation and <br />assembled existing City base information (the section map <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.