My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02206
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2200
>
pf_02206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:44:08 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 10:53:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2206
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
423 OWASSO BLVD S
Applicant
DUDDLESTON, JAMES
Status
APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />12 June 1991 <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: <br /> <br />2206 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />James Duddleston <br /> <br />LOCATION: <br /> <br />423 S. Owasso Blvd. <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> <br />Vacation of utility and <br />Drainage Easements <br /> <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Mr. Duddleston owns a lot on Lake Owasso which adjoins a <br />lot owned by Ralph and Nancy Palmer. Mr. Duddleston built <br />a storage shed unknowingly straddling the property line <br />with the Palmer's lot. Rather than move the storage <br />building, Mr. Duddleston and the Palmers have agreed to <br />simply move the property line separating their lots so <br />that the shed is totally on Mr. Duddleston's lot, with the <br />appropriate setback. This can be done with an <br />administrative lot split, but the lot line has an existing <br />5' drainage and utility easement on either side. Before <br />the lot split can proceed, the existing easement must be <br />vacated, which is the request before the Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />After the lot split, the Duddleston lot will be slightly <br />larger, and the Palmer lot will be slightly smaller, but <br />still more than the minimum required by Code. The revised <br />property line will not encroach on any required setbacks <br />on the Palmer lot. <br /> <br />2. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />We recommend the vacation of the drainage and utility <br />easement be granted with the condition that a similar <br />easement be secured when the administrative lot split is <br />processed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.