Laserfiche WebLink
Member DeBenedet noted Leadership, Environment and Energy Design (LEED) <br /> requirements, with points allotted for stormwater plans, but only up to the point of <br /> meeting regulatory requirements, which he found to be an odd concept. As an <br /> example, Member DeBenedet referenced the expansion and remodeling of the <br /> Ramsey County Library—Roseville Branch and their incorporation of a number <br /> of stormwater features not required to achieve LEED Certification. <br /> Related to stormwater issues, Member Gjerdingen expressed his personal concern <br /> with recent trenches installed along streets (e.g. Pascal south of County Road B) <br /> that negatively impacted pedestrian accessibility. Member Gjerdingen opined <br /> that, depending on their location, he preferred that a considerable amount of care <br /> be given to how and where they were used; noting that they affected future <br /> abilities to pave pathways in that area, as grading shifted significantly. <br /> For the benefit of the body, Mr. Schwartz advised that rain gardens and/or <br /> infiltration trenches had been installed as part of a previous pavement project. <br /> Member DeBenedet suggested that staff may want to calculate examples to cost <br /> out larger sites, and provide example sites to work out factoring interest in their <br /> cost-effectiveness evaluation. Member DeBenedet opined that staff may find that <br /> it doesn't pay to do this without the benefit of other motivating factors, even <br /> though it offered an opportunity to address additional stormwater issues. <br /> Chair Vanderwall opined that it would provide another tool in the toolbox that <br /> would help the City go in the desired direction in addressing stormwater <br /> management concerns. <br /> On behalf of staff, Mr. Schwartz thanked the PWETC for their feedback, advising <br /> that staff would take the proposal to the City Council at some point in the near <br /> future to receive their feedback as well, and whether staff was directed to proceed. <br /> 7. Update on Recycling for Business/Institutions <br /> At the request of Mr. Schwartz, Mr. Johnson noted inquiries from several <br /> churches and businesses to participate in the City's curbside recycling program. <br /> As detailed in the staff report, Mr. Johnson noted that these commercial and <br /> institutional properties had been using the blue recycling bins through the <br /> Roseville system for the past three years, while not paying the quarterly recycling <br /> fee, since the program was only intended for residential properties. <br /> In an effort to encourage their continued interest and participation in recycling, <br /> Mr. Johnson advised that staff had consulted with Eureka Recycling, who was <br /> willing to deliver a cart and add these properties to their routes if the City wanted <br /> to expand its recycling program. Mr. Johnson advised that the City would receive <br /> revenue sharing from anything coming out of these issues, and in an effort to tap <br /> into their interest and potentially expand the recycling program even further for <br /> Page 8 of 14 <br />