Laserfiche WebLink
<br />))) J <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 8-24-92 <br />ITEM NO.: Œ-5 <br /> <br />Depar~roval: <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Agenda section: <br /> <br />Hearings <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Concordia Academy request for an amendment to <br />the approved PUD plan for a new ground <br />entrance sign at 2400 N. Dale Street. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />1. The City Council previously approved a planned unit <br />development for the Concordia Academy and Rottlund Homes <br />project at County Road B and Dale project. <br /> <br />2. As part of the project, the applicant dedicated a portion of <br />their property to meet the park dedication requirements. <br /> <br />3 . The PUD plan showed an entrance sign for the school to be <br />located at the northeast corner of Lovell and Dale Street. <br />The land where the proposed sign was to go was originally <br />part of the land dedicated to the City for the park. The <br />ownership of the small triangular piece of property was <br />retained by Concordia. Because this creates a new parcel and <br />property lines, the PUD needs to be amended to reflect this. <br /> <br />4. The Planning commission unanimously recommended approval of <br />the prop~sed PUD amendment. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the proposed PUD amendment based on the finding that the <br />proposal would be detrimental to the health, safety, and <br />welfare of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />2. Grant the PUD amendment based on the finding that the <br />proposal would not be detrimental to the general health I <br />safety, and welfare. <br /> <br />Policy Obiectives: <br /> <br />1. To insure that development occurs consistent with the City's <br />zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />2 . To approve PUD amendments where those amendments do not <br />adversely affect the overall development or the neighborhood. <br /> <br />staff Recommendation: <br />