2014_0505_CCpacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

3.0 BACKGROUND � 4.1 The property, located in Planning District 10, has a Comprehensive Plan land use � designation of Community Mixed-Use (CMU) and a corresponding zoning classification �1 of Community MiYed-Use (CMU) District. � 42 A�NOx sUB�IVIS1oN application has been submitted in lieu of the preliminary plat/final �� plat process because § 1104.04E (Minor Subdivision) of the City Code establishes the �� three-parcel minor subdivision process to simplify those subdivisions "which create a 1� total of three or [fewer] parcels, situated in an area [adequately served by public utilities � and streets], and the new parcels meet or exceed the size requirements of the zoning � code." The current application meets all of these criteria. 1 5.0 REVIEW OF PROPOSED MINOR SUBDIVISION � 51 Neither the CMU District nor the Subdivision Code established minimum dimensions or 2� area for CMU parcels. 2 52 City Code § 1103.04 (Easements) requires 12-foot-wide drainage and utility easements 2� centered on the rear and new, common side property lines; these easements are illustrated � in Attachment A. �� 53 City Code § 1103.07 (Park Dedication) specifies that park dedication applies "when a 2 new building site is created in excess of one acre." While park dedication is not triggered �� by the proposed Mnvox su��IVIS1oN because no new building sites are being created, the �� property owner recognizes that future redevelopment of the parcels may well increase 2_� demand for park facilities and is warking on documentation committing the owners of the �- properties to park dedication contributions at the time of future redevelopment. Such � documentation will be included among the attachments to this RCA. � 5.4 In reviewing the application, comments from Roseville's Development Review v Committee (DRC) were primarily from Public Warks Department staff; their main � comments were as follows: .� a. The utility services for each building must not cross the new, shared property � boundary; � b. An easement or other agreement providing shared access of the parking facilities and � site entrances will be necessary; and � c. A building code analysis by an architect will be required to provide allowable area � calculations and verify that no increased ratings would be required due to the � proposed location of the property line. � 5.5 Depending on the results of the architect's analysis of the existing buildings, the �� proposed common parcel boundary may shift from its proposed location. The final � location of the new parcel boundary will need to be such that both new parcels meet all �� applicable requirements of the Zoning Code. � 5.6 According to the procedure established in § 1104.04E, if a lvmvoR su��IVIS1oN application �� is approved, a survey of the approved parcels, the new legal descriptions, and any necessary Quit Claim or Warranty deeds must be submitted within 30 days for PF14-008 RCA 050514.doc Page 2 of 3