My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02268
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2200
>
pf_02268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:46:49 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 10:55:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2268
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
1276 COUNTY ROAD B W
Applicant
COVERT, ROBERT
Status
APPROVED
PIN
152923120005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~7..~~ <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 7-08-91 <br /> <br />ITEM NO.: :ß - L} <br /> <br />Department Approval: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda section: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Bob and shirley Covert request for a minor <br />variance at 1277 W. County Road B. <br /> <br />Backaround: <br /> <br />1. City ordinances require that residential driveways be no more <br />than 26 feet wide, be setback at least 5 feet from a side <br />property line and that driveways must be at least 10 feet <br />apart. <br /> <br />2. Bob and Shirley Covert have an existing driveway which is 47 <br />feet wide and which is setback only 2 feet from the side <br />property line. The Covert's have requested a variance to <br />allow the driveway to remain at its existing location and <br />configuration. <br /> <br />3. The Minor variance Committee reviewed this application and <br />determined that there was not hardship demonstrated to <br />justify a 47 foot wide driveway. The Minor Variance <br />Committee however did unanimously recommend for a variance to <br />allow the 47 foot driveway to be divided into two driveways <br />with a 5 foot separation instead of the required 10 feet and <br />to have sideyard setback of 2 feet instead of the required 5 <br />feet. The Minor Variance Committee felt this variance was <br />justified and necessary to continue to provide access to an <br />existing asphalt parking area between the garage and house. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the variances based on there being no hardship <br />demonstrated. <br /> <br />2. Approve the variances as requested. <br /> <br />Policy Objective: <br /> <br />1. To require that driveways be brought into conformance with <br />City ordinances at the time the street is improved during the <br />City's pavement management program. <br /> <br />2. To grant variances where hardship exists. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.