Laserfiche WebLink
23 � the time between tabling of the item on April 21st and submitting for Council action on <br />2s���- May 12th were adequate to prepare the materials, the applicant was reluctant to spend <br />23�% signif'icantly more money on such engineering costs without the relative certainty offered <br />23� by approval of the Preliminary Plat. Such engineering data would necessarily be prepared <br />239 in time far consideration of the Fnv�, pLAT. <br />2�0 7.0 PUBLIC COMMENT <br />24� <br />24:f <br />24� <br />24� <br />24 `, <br />24{� <br />24 �` <br />7.1 The duly-noticed public hearing for this application was held by the Planning <br />Commission at its meeting of April 10, 2014; draft minutes of the meeting are included <br />with this RCA as Attachment E. No concerns were expressed about the number or size of <br />the proposed lots, but some people were nervous about the fact that duplexes and other <br />two-family structures are permitted in the LDR-2 district. In the end, the majority of <br />Planning Commissioners were comfortable that one-family detached homes will be <br />developed as proposed and voted, 6— 1, to recommend approval of the application. <br />24� 72 <br />24 ; <br />25�"- <br />25' <br />25;< <br />25v <br />25� <br />25u 8.0 <br />25�'> <br />25 ,' <br />25� <br />25� <br />25:'� <br />26' <br />26 % <br />In addition to the comments offered at the public hearing, Planning Division staff has <br />received one email and a few phone calls from neighboring property owners about the <br />proposal. None of these has a particular problem with the proposed one-family <br />development, but people's concerns are related ensuring that the storm water issues are <br />not exacerbated by the development and that the properties are developed with single- <br />family, detached homes as presented in the developer's open house meeting. The email is <br />included with this RCA as Attachment F. <br />RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTIONS <br />8.1 Adopt an ordinance rezoning the property at 297-311 County Road B from LDR-1 <br />to LDR-2. Based on the comments and findings outlined in Sections 3— 4 and 7 of this <br />report, the Planning Division concurs with the recommendation of the Planning <br />Commission and continues to recommend approval of the proposed �zoNnvG of the <br />property at 297-311 County Road B from LDR-1 to LDR-2, pursuant to Title 10 of the <br />Roseville City Code, with the condition that the rezoning shall be contingent upon <br />approval and recording of the fmal plat. <br />26::> 82 Pass a motion approving the proposed easement vacation and preliminary plat for <br />26� the property at 297-311 County Road B. Based on the comments and findings outlined <br />26� in Sections 3, 5, and 7 of this report, the Planning Division concurs with the <br />2es recommendations of the Planning Commission and Public Warks Department to approve <br />26i the proposed EASEMENT vACAT1oN at 311 County Road B, and to approve the originally <br />26� proposed pRELIMrIVARY pLAT, pursuant to Title 11 of the Roseville City Code, with the <br />26v following conditions: <br />27t:; <br />27 i <br />27� <br />,; � <br />� ��� � 9.0 <br />27v 9.1 <br />2?6 <br />a. The final approval of the easement vacation shall be contingent upon approval and <br />recording of the final plat; and <br />b. Permits for site improvements shall not be issued without iterative review of the tree <br />preservation plan to account for any impacts not previously anticipated. <br />ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL ACTIONS <br />Pass a motion to table one or more of the items for future action. Tabling will require <br />continued consent of the applicant. <br />PF14-002 Prelim RCA 051514.doc <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />