Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br />County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 23rd day of July 2001, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Mastel, Maschka, Kysylyczyn, Klausing, and Goedeke <br />and the following were absent: None <br /> <br />Council Member Kysylyczyn introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9909 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 17 FOOT VARIANCE FROM SECTION 703.04BIA <br />OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT <br />3175 WEST OW ASSO BOULEVARD (pF 3323) <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Paul Grotenhuis has requested a 17 foot variance from Section 703 .04B 1 a of the <br />Roseville City Code in coordination with City's Pavement Management Program; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Grotenhuis's property is located at 3175 West Owasso Boulevard and legally <br />described at as: <br /> <br />SECTION 2 TOWN 29 RANGE 23 A 15 FT BY 300 FT STRIP SLY OF AND ADJ AND FOL BEG 30 <br />FT S OF N SEC L AND ON WLY L OF OWASSO BLVD N TH SLY 150 FT ON SD WLY L TH WLY AT <br />RA 315 FT TH NLY AT RA 55 7/10 FT TO PT 30 FT S OF N SEC L TH E TO BEG IN GOVT LOT 1 <br />SEC (PID # 022923110035) <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 703.04B1a requires a 26 foot maximum driveway apron width in the <br />public right-of-way; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Mr. Grotenhuis's existing driveway is 49 feet in width to access the existing <br />detached garage; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the variance <br />request by Mr. Grotenhuis and recommended (7-0) to approve the request, based on findings outlined <br />in Section 4 of the project report dated 7/11/01. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to grant Paul <br />Grotenhuis a 17 foot variance from Section 703.04B1a of the Roseville City Code based on the <br />findings in Section 4 of the project report dated 7/23/01. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member <br />Klausing and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Mastel, Mashka, Kysylyczyn, <br />Klausing, and Goedeke. <br /> <br />and the following voted against: none <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />1 <br />