My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02311
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2300
>
pf_02311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:47:23 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:09:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2311
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
265 TRANSIT AVE
Applicant
BOWMAN, BOYD
Status
APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />/\3 \ \ <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 4-27-92 <br />ITEM NO.: ¡;--1 <br /> <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda section: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Boyd Bowman request for a minor variance at <br />265 W. Transit Avenue. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />1. City ordinances require that residences have rear yard <br />setbacks of at least 30 feet. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Boyd Bowman has requested <br />construct an addition onto <br />have a rear yard setback of <br />30 feet. <br /> <br />a variance to allow him to <br />his existing house which would <br />21 feet instead of the required <br /> <br />3. All affected neighbors have indicated their approval of the <br />variance. <br /> <br />4. The Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommended approval <br />of the variance. The Committee felt a hardship was present <br />because of the unusual shape of the lot and the location of <br />the existing house on the lot. The Committee also felt that <br />because of the existing berm and mature evergreen trees along <br />the rear property line, that this proposal would not <br />adversely affect adjacent properties. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the variance based on the finding that no hardship or <br />practical difficulty exists. <br /> <br />2. Grant the variance if it is found that a hardship or <br />practical difficulty is present on the site. <br /> <br />Policy Objectives: <br /> <br />1. To insure that development occurs in accordance wi th the <br />City's comprehensive plan and ordinances. <br /> <br />2. To grant variances where hardships or practical difficulties <br />exist. <br /> <br />staff Recommendation: <br /> <br />1. It is recommended that the City Council grant Boyd Bowman's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.