My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02315
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2300
>
pf_02315
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:47:32 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:09:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2315
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
2319 VICTORIA ST N
Applicant
GOGINS, GREGORY
PIN
112923310071
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3'S <br />r; <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 5-28-91 <br />ITEM NO.: ~ - tj <br /> <br />Department Approval: <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda section: <br /> <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />Gregory and Debra Gogins request for a minor <br />variance at 2319 N. victoria Street. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />1. In the mid 1970's, the State of Minnesota acquired <br />approximately 70 feet of right-of-way from the Gogins <br />property to allow the realignment of the service drive <br />serving the adjacent apartments. This acquisition left the <br />Gogins dwelling with a 10 foot setback instead of the <br />required 30 foot setback. <br /> <br />2. city ordinances state that non-conforming structures such as <br />this, cannot be expanded. <br /> <br />3. The Gogins wish to add an addition onto the north side of <br />their dwelling which would be setback 12 feet. <br /> <br />4. The Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommended approval <br />of the variance because of the hardship presented by the <br />previous acquisition of the right-of-way by the State and <br />because the proposed addi tion would be no closer to the <br />right-of-way than the existing dwelling. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the variance based on the finding that no hardship <br />exists. <br /> <br />2. Approve the variance as requested. <br />Policy Obiectives: <br /> <br />1. To require non-conforming dwellings to be brought into <br />compliance over time by not allowing significant expansion or <br />investment. <br /> <br />2. To grant variances where hardships exist. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />1. It is recommended that the City Council approve Gregory and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.