My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02340
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2300
>
pf_02340
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:47:55 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:09:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2340
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
3011 LITTLE BAY RD
Applicant
WILLARD, PAUL W.
Status
APPROVED
PIN
012923210026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />J)qD <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 7-08-91 <br />ITEM NO.: ß... (, <br /> <br />Department Approval: <br /> <br />y <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda section: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Paul willard request for a minor variance at <br />3011 Little Bay Road. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />1. City ordinances require that structures be setback 10 feet <br />from the side property line. <br /> <br />2. Paul Willard is requesting a minor variance to expand a <br />double car garage into a triple car garage at 3011 Little <br />Bay Road. The house is located on the property such that it <br />is not parallel with the side property line. This results <br />in the rear corner of the addi tion being further away from <br />the side property line than the corner of the addition. <br /> <br />3 . The Minor variance Commi ttee determined that there was no <br />hardship present to justify the expansion originally <br />requested by the applicant. However, 'the Committee <br />unanimously would recommend a slightly smaller addition such <br />that the rear corner of the addition would meet the 10.6 foot <br />setback but that the front corner would require a variance of <br />.65 feet. This variance was justified because of the fact <br />that the house does not sit parallel to the side property <br />line. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the variance request based on there being no hardship <br />demonstrated. <br /> <br />2. Approve the variance as requested. <br /> <br />pOlicy Objectives: <br /> <br />1. To insure that construction occurs in conformance with city <br />zoning ordinance. <br /> <br />2. To allow expansion of structures on single family residential <br />property. <br /> <br />3. To approve variances where hardships are demonstrated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.