My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02355
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2300
>
pf_02355
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:48:43 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:10:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2355
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
2231 RICE ST
Applicant
DUFFY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Status
APPROVED
PIN
122923440027
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
344
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />l)Al--ILGREN <br />Sl--IARDLOW <br />AND . UBAN <br /> <br />INCORPORATED <br /> <br />CONSULTING PLANNERS <br />LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS <br /> <br />300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH <br />SUITE 210 <br />MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 <br />612,339·3300 <br /> <br />31 December 1991 <br /> <br />John Duffy <br />Duffy Development Company <br />10850 Old County Road 15 <br />Plymouth, ~.1:!'1 55441 <br /> <br />t(Ö)[P1[ <br /> <br />Dear John: <br /> <br />The Roseville City Staff has reviewed the final PUD plans submitted for the Calibre Ridge project. While <br />many of the items we hád discussed previously are included in these plans, there are still a number of <br />details that need to be provided: <br /> <br />1) The proposed site lighting does not appear to cover all parking areas in the project. <br /> <br />2) The lighting plan shows "average" light levels. City Code, Chapter 19, requires minimum <br />light levels in all parking areas. Average light levels are not an acceptable criterion, nor <br />can we tell what these levels are based on. We would prefer to see an isolux plan based on <br />the manufacturer's representation of lumen levels of a given fixture at the proposed height. <br /> <br />3) The Engineering Department has seven additional comments that are included in the <br />attached memo of 23 December. <br /> <br />If you have questions or comments, please call Rick Jopke, Karl Keel, or me. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW, AND UBAN, INC. <br /> <br />Philip Carlson, AICP <br />for the Roseville Community Development Department <br /> <br />Attachment <br /> <br />cc: Rick Jopke <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.