My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0421
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2014 12:51:35 PM
Creation date
5/15/2014 12:51:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 21, 2014 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that the proposed language was written in way <br /> that does allow neighborhoods to go on as they are if no problems exist; however, <br /> she remained troubled that the full discussion was not taking place at this time. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed her interest in addressing sight lines, drive- <br /> ways and other issues at the same time this proposed language is considered. Not <br /> that she didn't support this proposal and recognizing it as a good start in solving <br /> problems for particular residents using streets for storage and creating safety con- <br /> cerns, a pattern in some places, but Councilmember Laliberte opined that without <br /> subsequent changes being addressed also, she was not ready to support only this <br /> portion of it. <br /> Mayor Roe, assuming specifics and reasons for leniency were still needed, with <br /> those options available when an issue came before the City Council for action, he <br /> opined that this allowed the City Council to stay on top of any additional discus- <br /> sions, while looking at the maximum and specific number of items occurring on a <br /> given property. Mayor Roe recognized that there were many aspects of the exist- <br /> ing Nuisance Code that needed refreshing, he spoke in support of this revision, <br /> and anticipating further and ongoing discussion as the larger issues were re- <br /> viewed. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: McGehee; Willmus; Etten; and Roe <br /> Nays: Laliberte. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> By consensus, it was determined that no Ordinance Summary was necessary. <br /> b. Adopt an Ordinance amending the Definition of Community Mixed Use in <br /> Chapter 4, Land Use of the Comprehensive Plan and the Statement of Pur- <br /> pose in Section 1005.07.A of the Zoning Ordinance <br /> City Planner Thomas Paschke summarized the request as detailed in the RCA dat- <br /> ed April 21, 2014. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon noted that, since this was proposed Comprehensive Plan <br /> amendment, it required a super majority vote of the Council. <br /> McGehee moved, Etten seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11145 (Attachment <br /> B) entitled, "A Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Definition of Com- <br /> munity Mixed-Use (CMU) in Chapter 4, Land Use (PROJ0030) of the Compre- <br /> hensive Plan. <br /> Mayor Roe, speaking in support of the motion, noted that it was consistent with <br /> City Council discussions held over the last few months. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.