My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02394
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2300
>
pf_02394
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:50:40 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:11:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2394
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
2923 HAMLINE AVE N
Applicant
HEWITT, JOHN
Status
APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />;Yî+ <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 5-11-92 <br /> <br />ITEM NO.: þ--3 <br /> <br />Department Approval: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item Des~on: <br /> <br />Manage~eViewed: <br /> <br />Agenda section: <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />John Hewitt request for a minor variance at <br />2923 Hamline Avenue. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />1. City ordinances require that attached garages have a minimum <br />5 foot setback on this particular site at 2923 Hamline <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />2. Mr. Hewi tt proposes to remove an existing non-conforming <br />detached garage and replace it with an attached garage. The <br />garage would have a side yard setback of 3.8 feet at the <br />front corner and 7.9 feet at the back corner. <br /> <br />3. Affected adjacent neighbors have signed approval of the <br />variance request. <br /> <br />4. The Minor Variance Committee felt this was a reasonable <br />request based on the hardship presented by the location of <br />the house on the lot which is not perpendicular to Hamline <br />Avenue and because the location of the existing access door, <br />steps, and well room on the house make the proposed location <br />and width the only reasonable alternative. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the variance based on the finding that no hardship or <br />practical difficulty exists. <br /> <br />2. Approve the variance request based on the finding that a <br />hardship and/or practical difficulty exists on the site. <br /> <br />Policy Obiectives: <br /> <br />1. To insure that development occurs consistent with the City's <br />comprehensive plan and zoning ordinances. <br /> <br />2. To grant variances where hardships or practical difficulties <br />exist. <br /> <br />staff Recommendation: <br /> <br />1. It is recommended that the city Council approve John Hewitt's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.