pf_02413 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Willmus, Case No. 2413 Page 6 3) The applicant has assured us there will be no maintenance or cleaning of vehicles on site. 4) The storage of vehicles on site will not interfere with vehicle and pedestrian access and circulation. 5) The applicant has assured us there will be no visible evidence of the use, other than signage in the approved space on the pylon and the building facade. 6) The use will not have a negative impact, based six criteria for evaluating Special Uses in section (except landscaping and trash dumpsters, as previously) . on the 12.035 noted The following issues are not as clear-cut: 1) Is the storage of vehicles on this site "purely an accessory use", or does it "alter the appearance and character of the property"? The stored vehicles will occupy over a third of the spaces on the site, but they will be at the rear of the building. It is not the maj or or principle use of the property, but neither is it insignificant. If the Commission believes the use is not accessory, the request could be denied, or modified in some way to make the use fit the term "accessory". If the Commission believes the use is accessory, then the request could be approved, depending on the other issues outlined below. 2) since this use occupies only a portion of a multi-tenant building, do we require the entire site to be brought into complete compliance with the Code and city right-of-way dedication policy? Would these issues be considered "reasonable conditions" to attach to the approval? If so, the following would have to be addressed: a) The trash dumpsters would need to be enclosed. b) Landscaping would have to be added, both internally and on the Cleveland Avenue boulevard, according to the requirements of the design standards. c) 9.5' on County Road B-2 would have to be dedicated.