My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0505
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2014 12:57:22 PM
Creation date
5/20/2014 12:57:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/5/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 5, 2014 <br /> Page 7 <br /> seemed to be very little understanding of the nature of trees and their value, and <br /> how best to protect them during construction and what was meant by compaction <br /> and an inherent way to protect them. Regarding Cottonwood trees specifically, <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted that they provided a significant home for certain <br /> types of birds, including Baltimore Orioles as a nesting area; and agreed that sig- <br /> nificant trees should be retained. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that there was a role for the Parks & Recreation <br /> Commissions, in their role as the Tree Board, to enter into this discussion. Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus agreed that the current tree preservation ordinance was wide <br /> open from his perspective, and needed review. <br /> Councilmember McGehee suggested the Public Works Department's Environ- <br /> mental Engineer should also be involved in future discussions as consideration <br /> was given to natural area management plans; and further opined that the ordi- <br /> nance and its oversight may be better served in the Public Works Department for <br /> the Engineer to review stormwater issues and wetland preservation. <br /> Acting Mayor Laliberte opined that having development happen in the communi- <br /> ty when it was so nearly fully-developed was a great benefit, and suggested more <br /> coordination was needed among parties identified, including a tree specialist or <br /> forester in the Parks & Recreation Department, and for engineering issues within <br /> the Public Works Department. <br /> Planning Commissioner Boguszewski agreed with Council concerns with how the <br /> current ordinance was written and how trees were apparently reviewed in aggre- <br /> gate rather than taking heritage trees into consideration. Commissioner Bo- <br /> guszewski opined that by involving the City Engineer, and/or Forester to rewrite <br /> the ordinance should make it tighter or provide better guidance, rather than re- <br /> strictions; and as a Planning Commissioner, he would support a more robust writ- <br /> ing of the ordinance. <br /> Planning Commissioner Daire noted that he and his wife were volunteer caretak- <br /> ers at Willow Pond, and noted the considerable amount of Black Walnut trees <br /> growing naturally as planted by squirrels. Since it was on public land, and con- <br /> sidering the value of those mature trees, Commissioner Daire suggested it could <br /> become a revenue resource for the City and as an active way to address and fund <br /> the tree preservation program and generate revenue for the City. <br /> At the request of Acting Mayor Laliberte, Chair Gisselquist stated that the Plan- <br /> ning Commission would be willing to take on this review at the direction of the <br /> City Council; and that they would encourage expertise from other parties men- <br /> tioned. In order to sufficiently address all issues, Chair Gisselquist suggested the <br /> involvement of the Public Works and Parks & Recreation Commissions and staff <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.