Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, April 15, 2014 <br />Page 5 <br />1 <br />but a more comprehensive effort was needed. With the hiring of a new Director, and <br />2 <br />formalization of these efforts, along with funding to do so, Chair Maschka opined that the <br />3 <br />overall efforts would make those long-needed efforts even better for the entire community. <br />4 <br />5 <br />Ayes: 6 <br />6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />7 <br />Motion carried. <br />8 <br />9 <br />b.Use of CDBG Funds for SHRP Program <br />10 <br />Ms. Kelsey reviewed the request of the GMHC for the use of Roseville Community <br />11 <br />Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for gap financing for affordable housing <br />12 <br />opportunities for families. Ms. Kelsey noted that Ramsey County had also asked staff for <br />13 <br />input on how they intended to use the funds, as they were often audited by the Federal <br />14 <br />Government, originator of the funding, on how unexpended funds and why funds were not <br />15 <br />being expended. <br />16 <br />17 <br />Ms. Kelsey opined that, when the GMHC presented their desire to target seniors wishing to <br />18 <br />move into their proposed Dale Street Project or elsewhere in the community, but not wishing <br />19 <br />to do improvements to their current homes, it provided a great opportunity to actively engage <br />20 <br />those residents. Overall, Ms. Kelsey noted that the GMHC had a great reputation in providing <br />21 <br />such assistance; and that their intent in this request would be for gap financing for down <br />22 <br />payments to bring them into the affordability range for homeowners. <br />23 <br />24 <br />Ms. Kelsey noted that the GMHC would make application to Ramsey County, under the <br />25 <br />CDBG program for City of Roseville-designated funds to be used for the purpose of <br />26 <br />rehabilitating those homes, with one-third of their mortgage forgiven after a certain period of <br />27 <br />time. Ms. Kelsey advised that, one caveat of this approval, would include RHRA staff review <br />28 <br />and ultimate approval on a case by case basis, to ensure that no additional poverty issues were <br />29 <br />created. Ms. Kelsey sought direction of the HRA in whether they were supportive of this <br />30 <br />request that would essentially meet the goals and objections of its original Housing <br />31 <br />Regeneration Program; and open opportunities for families in Roseville. Ms. Kelsey advised <br />32 <br />that the HRA, at its discretion, could also restrict the funding to families with children under a <br />33 <br />certain age. <br />34 <br />35 <br />At the request of Chair Maschka, Ms. Kelsey confirmed that these funds, if used to write down <br />36 <br />the cost for a second mortgage, would be recycled; however, if they were used to fund <br />37 <br />rehabilitation, they most likely would not be recycled. Ms. Kelsey advised that, depending on <br />38 <br />the original purchase price of the home and its value after rehabilitation, first-time homebuyer <br />39 <br />restrictions for Ramsey County would apply, based on income qualifications of less than 80%, <br />40 <br />with no waiver available from that threshold, with income for a family of four at <br />41 <br />approximately $64,000 to qualify for utilization of those funds. <br />42 <br />43 <br />At the request of Chair Maschka and Member Etten, Ms. Kelsey clarified that the majority of <br />44 <br />first mortgage funding would come from Fannie May or the State of MN, with a maximum <br />45 <br />purchase price not exceeding $298,000. <br />46 <br />47 <br />At the request of Member Etten, Ms. Kelsey reviewed practicalities of the program, in <br />48 <br />providing assistance to home-buyers within the income range; with GMHC purchasing the <br />49 <br />home, rehabilitating it and then reselling it on the open market. Ms. Kelsey noted that the <br />50 <br />realtor of choice would most likely be the one representing the Dale Street Project, who was <br />51 <br />willing to provide a discount on commissions, and it was anticipated they would do so for <br />52 <br />selling on the back side as well. <br />53 <br />54 <br />Chair Maschka opined that the proposal made great sense to assist senior-aged, single-family <br />55 <br />homeowners the ability to get into a townhome or other unit with less upkeep required. <br /> <br />