My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02471
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2400
>
pf_02471
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:53:18 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:32:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2471
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
674 COUNTY ROAD C W
Applicant
PARKRIDGE DEVELOPMENT
Status
WITHDRWN
PIN
112923110007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />June 3, 1994 <br /> <br /> <br />Steve Sarkozy, City Manager <br />Mike Falk, City Planner <br />Dennis Welsch, Dir. COIIIDunity Development <br />2660 Civic Center DriV8'~ <br />Rosevi11e, Minn. 55113 <br /> <br />Following the meeting that we had June 1, 1994, I consulted <br />with the principals of the Parkridge Development and we concluded <br />the following would be in the best interest of all parties con- <br />cerned. <br /> <br />I - A continuation of both Council and Planning Commission <br />hearings until such time the comprehensive plan as pro- <br />posed by Vists 2000 be in place and approved ~ both <br />Council and Planning Commission. <br /> <br />2 - The Planning Commission felt that there was inadequate <br />information on site drainage and ponding. We have pro- <br />posed two options. It will take considerable time for <br />the Civil Engineers to prepare the documents. The doc- <br />uments must then be submitted to the City Engineer for <br />approval. It will be impossible to have these documents <br />prepared, for submission, for any near future hearings. <br /> <br />3 - We feel that the wide distribution of public hearing <br />notice should be confined to the three hundred fifty (350) <br />foot radius as mandated by code and ordinance, avoiding <br />confusion with other properties in the near vicinity <br />that are being considered for change in the comprehensive <br />plan. <br /> <br />4 - We respectfully request, that all public hearings as it <br />pertains to the Parkridge Development, be continued until <br />such time that the comprehensive plan, as proposed ~ <br />Vista 2000 be completed and approved by the City Council <br />and Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitte <br />Parkridge Development Co. <br /> <br />OR J{~ <br /> <br />Al Kehr: partner <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.