pf_02471 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

On ~~ 3, 1m, .Mr. KrJiT ~ thç C9"'P'!~'J) to (pn~ ;¡ C(}ntinuation of the PbJnqiqr Ço~ ~pd CQ.nçi1 .~~ ~~f ~ TÇ~ ~~ tø ;¡ ~~~1 PUD. Mr~ 1'~ "~ ~ ~ tgriJlP bç cont!RI~ ..1 aftq" ~ r~1ten~ve Guide PI¥- revision~ h¡we been COJQPleted. ALTERNA¡IVE ACI'JONS: 1) By MOTION, recommend denial of the Concept Plan for a 23 unit townhouse PIamed Unit Development at a densi1y of 6 units per acre as being too dense (4 units is the maximum), not consistent with the existing Comprehensive Guide Plan Designation of the site as Low Demity Residential (as per the Council action of May 23, 1994), and an inadequate set of pJam regarding drainage, grading, landscaping. (State, in the motion, as many reasons as the Commission may have for such as reoommeodation. This would send the issue on to the City Council for further action. If the Council denied the PUD rezoning request, the Code stipulates that the awlicant could not reaw1y for a similar rezoning bearing on this site for at least 6 months.) 2) By MOTION, reoommeod approval of the request as consi&ent with the Planning Commission's action of May 11, 1994. (This is a problem because the PUD Concept aw1ication and submittals are not complete as viewed by the staff and because the Council bas determined that the Comprehensive Guide Plan should remain Low Density - single family or at least, units no more . than 4 per acre.) 3) By MOTION, accept or deny a request of the applicant to continue the Concept Plan Rezoning Hearing to a specifi£ Planning Commission meeting date, pending the completion of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. (Staff estimates that this may be the September 14, or October 12, 1994, meeting.) 4) By MOTION, acœpt a request of the applicant, to table action on the proja,1 indefinitely. The Commission should ~ that such a request will require a completed set of applications and submittals and another set of public bearings on the Comprehensive Guide Plan and the PUD Concept Plan.