Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l....1 <br /> <br />LAND USE/CIRCULATION ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />. ~ <br /> <br />EXHIBIT 4: SCALE 1"-200' <br />FUTURE REDEVELOPMENT No <br />ALL PARCELS BETWEEN KEHR AND DALE..~TREET <br />PLUS FUTURE STREET CONNECTIONS <br /> <br />Exhibit 4 <br /> <br />1. Exhibit 4 illustrates a potential configuration of buildings. assuming .tþe incorporation of <br />all of the properties to the east ofKehr. It is only an illustration for discussion purposes. <br />This change is unlikely to occur any time soon because the two properties (Britz and <br />Booth) appear to be in good condition. Mr. Britz spoke in opposition to the change at the <br />Council hearing. (Mr. Booth stated he was concerned about being left as an "island" and <br />increased taxes). <br /> <br />2. As Figure 4 shows, the combination of the northern half of the Salverda property. with the <br />Britz and Booth parcels would allow approximately 6 units to be built. No driveway <br />would have direct access onto County Road C. This would only occur if all three of the <br />owners agreed to sell. They would control the situation completely. In the meantime, the <br />MR designation would be an asset to them adding flexibility for the future. <br />3. The Kehr-Borgstrom-Salverda-Britz and Booth 39 unit development will add <br />approximately 58 new residents, generate between 240 and 270 total traffic movements (in <br />and out) and add an estimated $5.8 million in new housing development. <br />