pf_02471 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Exhibit 2 1. Exhibit 2 adds the Borgstrom Property (estimated at 7 housing units) to the Kehr PUD. In Mr. Borgstrom's letter he states that he has been in negotiations with Mr. Kehr to sell his property and he requested the change in land use for his property as well. 2. The Borgstrom Property can be very efficiently added to the proposed street design in the Kehr proposal and no street needs be extended to Dale St. at this point. 3. The Kehr-Borgstrom 30 unit development will add approximately 45 new residents, generate between 180 and 210 total traffic movements (in and out); and add an estimated $4.5 million in new housing development. Exhibit 3 1. Exhibit 3 adds the Salverda Property. John Shardlow has met with Leonard Salverda, who has indicated his support for the change. He has submitted a letter indicating his support (actually the land is in his mother's name). 2. When the Salverda parcel is developed, the street connection to Dale Street must be constructed. Mr. Salverda understands the need for this connection, but, he is understandably concerned about the effect that the location of this roadway could have on the development potential of the northern half of the Salverda land. The specific alignment of this road would be determined at the time his land was sold and a development proposal is reviewed. 3. The Kehr-Borgstrom-Salverda 34 unit development will add approximately 51 new residents, generate between 210 and 235 total traffic movements (in and out); and add an estimated $5.1 million in new housing development. Exhibit 4 1. Exhibit 4 illustrates a potential configuration of buildings, assuming the incorporation of all of the properties to the east ofKehr. It is only an illustration for discussion purposes. This change is unlikely to occur any time soon because the two properties (Britz and Booth) appear to be in good condition. Mr. Britz spoke in opposition to the change at the Council hearing. (Mr. Booth stated he was concerned about being left as an "island" and increased taxes). 2. As Figure 4 shows, the combination of the northern half of the Salverda property, with the Britz and Booth parcels would allow approximately 6 units to be built. No driveway would have direct access onto County Road C. This would only occur if all three of the owners agreed to sell. They would control the situation completely. In the meantime, the MR designation would be an asset to them adding flexibility for the future. 3