Laserfiche WebLink
<br />12/10/92 13:00 <br /> <br />DSU. INC. <br /> <br />-t..,-t ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />141001 <br /> <br />1 1 <br /> <br />Post-lt,.. brand fax tninsmittal memo 767'1 tJafpages" 2-- <br />¡,,, ~ J,iv-ch <br /> <br />To J<4?í W <br />eo.. <br /> <br /> <br />co. <br /> <br />Dept. <br /> <br />pþone # <br /> <br />Fa, <br /> <br />Fm:# <br /> <br />< _..__. ___ _.__ _ .__. _ .___un_ _____,,",___..__.,.. __...... ",.0"__'''_. . _ ,_ ._ <br />. ,- - ".-.. . . <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />D..xrE: <br /> <br />10 Deœmber 1992 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Craig Wa1dron, RickJopke <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />John Shardlow. AlCP <br /> <br />KI· <br /> <br />Discussion ofParlaidge PÐD Project. NeîghboIbood Position. Planning Commission <br />Action <br /> <br />From reviewing our planning report you know 1bat 1here ale a :mnnber of unanswered questions <br />regarding Mr. Kebfs development proposal. I wüI.not duplicate that infQ]mati~ except to bigblight <br />what: I believe to be the most important œm:solved. ÎSSJ.1.eS. <br /> <br />With genoine a:ffuction for AL I can. say that one of 1he biggest: prob1fms in working with bìm is that <br />b8 co:nsîstenrly chooses what he wants 10 ~ I believe this is t.roe in his mnnerous meetings wDh <br />myself and our staff (going an tbe way back to HowaId). obviously tme inhis res¡xmse to the <br />Planning Commi~sioo.·s commeom at the SIœtcb. Plan. Review. and cl.eady evident in. his <br />misunderstanding of 1be neigbbo:d1ood's position. This selective 1istenîng ttans1.ates to selective <br />reading as be did not understand our plæming report to be fundamentally in su£'pott ofhis project. or <br />the clear distinction we were m~~ between commitments be needed m make, veÌsos rel3ted, <br />broader coIDIIJ.itmeDts that the City needed to make (Ïe. the fumre road extension to Da1e Street and the <br />change in. the Land Use PJan). <br /> <br />At the meeting last nig1:¢ this prob1em moved from problematic to bizaIre when neither AL nor any of <br />his representatÏves cou1d hear what was being said by the PI mning Cnmmi~on members or <br />neighbors due to the SOlJIld ~ DOt being tnmed up sufficiently. It would seem logical to me to <br />ei:Iber move to the tnJnt of the room. (from 1he very last row) or Jet us know 1hat: they can't hear sooner. <br />but we did not know until Pat Johnson spoke up well:into the hearirtg. <br /> <br />I know 1hat you. are. attempting to put mgether a memo to AI so I will briefly DOte wbere tœ project <br />sits as a reso:h of tbePhmning Commission's actîonJastnight. I wiD. divide these comments ìnto its <br />stttns wi1h us as a staff. with the PI mning CoIIlIIlission. and with the neighborl1ood. <br /> <br />Staff: <br /> <br />Simply stated the number of 1II1ÎrS proposed on 1be site do not fit. The edges with both of the adjacent <br />single famïl ~ i'fI. )peIties are just too tight and theIe is virtnaIly no buffering. AI bears comments like <br />this and sa) s I plan! huy BoJgmrùIll and the project is designed to expand to both the east and west, <br />which would œsol y~ these problems. Wen. we agree that such changes wou1d respond to these <br />œnœrns and we have been erIthusiasticany snpporting 1he assemblage of adjacent parc:e1s for many <br />