My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02477
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2400
>
pf_02477
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:53:51 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:32:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2477
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
SIGN ORDINANCE
Status
APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Gary voqel, Case No. 2494 <br /> <br />paqe 3 <br /> <br />3. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />While the City has an interest in assuring high quality, <br />attractive development on its public roadways, this must be <br />balanced with the real-world needs of businesses. When a new <br />business is built, these two issues can usually both be met, with <br />some reasonable compromise. In the case of Midway Ford, an <br />existing business is renovating its site in response to a city <br />action to vacate the frontage road. To comply wi th the Zoning <br />Code standards for the relocated fence, Midway Ford has two <br />options: <br /> <br />1) Build the fence less than 4' high in the front yard, or <br /> <br />2) Build the fence across the new parking area to keep the <br />view open from Snelling Avenue to the building, in keeping <br />with the previous variance. <br /> <br />Both of these options, in our opinion, present serious practical <br />difficulties. The first because it would not provide the needed <br />security, the second because it would impose unreasonable demands <br />for access through the fence within the parking lot, and would not <br />reasonably meet the aesthetic intent of the Code. The ci ty , in <br />its previous variance, acknowledged implicitly that the fence was <br />necessary for the site. For these reasons, we recommend approval <br />of the variance request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.