My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02477
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2400
>
pf_02477
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:53:51 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:32:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2477
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
SIGN ORDINANCE
Status
APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />10 March 1993 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Planning commission <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />John W. Shardlow, AICP <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Unresolved Sign Ordinance Issues <br /> <br />At the February meeting, only four planning commissioners were <br />present, due both to regular absences and John Goedeke's <br />appointment to the City Council. When we finally got to this item <br />on the agenda, the hour was late and at least one member of the <br />commission was feeling ill. Consequently, the decision was made to <br />continue this discussion to this month. <br /> <br />We have simply attached the same background memo that was included <br />in your packets last month. At this point, the City Council has <br />reviewed all of the recommendations that the Planning Commission <br />has made and has adopted the vast majority. On some others they <br />have agreed with the recommendations, but, have delayed adopting <br />them pending the resolution of the remaining questions. <br /> <br />OFF-PREMISES CHURCH SIGNS <br /> <br />The Council was not inclined to go along with the complete ban on <br />these signs that the Planning Commission had recommended. They did <br />favor limiting their size and they liked the idea of limiting their <br />locations to the next collector street (or some similar. limit). We <br />have maps illustrating the locations of all churches and other <br />institutional uses within the City. We also have maps showing the <br />locations of all collector streets. <br /> <br />SEASONAL BAlOfERS AND SPECIAL EVENT SIGNS FOR CHURCHES <br /> <br />The recommended ordinance called for a maximum of two special <br />events of four days per event. The Council suggested either an <br />increase to three events for a total of twelve days, or simply <br />allowing them twelve days that can be divided up any way the church <br />chooses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.