Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Farrell, Case No. 2500 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />especially on the north side. To the west of the right-of-way are <br />two lots (Farrell and Dustin) and then Ramsey County open space to <br />the west beyond these two lots. Because of these conditions, there <br />is little opportunity for development of very much land to be <br />served by Richmond street. <br /> <br />However, three of the lots in question (all except Dustin) might <br />be able to develop flag lots to take advantage of the deep back <br />yards, and the Farrells have indicated that they are interested in <br />pursuing this at a later date. The vacation of Richmond would <br />facilitate this. <br /> <br />In 1977 the City wanted to keep options open by vacating the <br />right-of-way for Dustin, but reserving an easement. Today, there <br />appears to be no need to reserve a roadway easement either. <br /> <br />Enaineerina Considerations <br /> <br />There are no utilities in the Richmond right-of-way now, ~ and no <br />need for additional utilities in the area, but Public' Works <br />suggests that a 30' utility easement, 15' on either side of the <br />centerline, be reserved in case there is a need for future work. <br />This easement would not encumber the development of the rear <br />portion of these lots. Driveways could be built over the <br />easement, but not buildings. <br /> <br />3. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Vegetation, wetlands, and topography would pose obstacles to the <br />construction of Richmond Street in this location. It is not a <br />necessary link in the City's roadway system, and all four affected <br />property owners have indicated their approval of the street <br />vacation. We recommend approval of the request with the condition <br />that a utility easement be reserved, 30' in width, 15' on either <br />side of the current centerline. <br />