My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02503
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2500
>
pf_02503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:55:19 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:48:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2503
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2775 HWY 35 W
Applicant
SIGNCRAFTERS/ROBERT YURECKO
Status
DENIED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />14 April 1993 <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: <br /> <br />2503 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />Signcrafters <br />(for McCarthy GMC) <br /> <br />LOCATION: <br /> <br />2775 Highway 35W <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br /> <br />variance (Sign) <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The McCarthy GMC auto dealer wants to erect a new pylon sign along <br />Long Lake Road at the southwest corner of their property which <br />would need a variance to both height and setback standards in the <br />Code. The applicant states (in the attached letter) that an <br />agreement was worked out with City staff before the recent changes <br />in the Sign Ordinance to allow the height variance, but that the <br />sign would meet the 30' front setback. The applicant also notes <br />that signage for adj acent businesses exceeds the Code standards <br />and that the GMC site suffers "complete visual obstruction". An <br />addendum to the request asks that the front setback be allowed to <br />be the same as the signs for the adjacent car businesses. <br /> <br />2. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS <br /> <br />The current Code standards require a business pylon sign to be <br />setback 30' from the front property line and be no more than 20' <br />tall. The request is for a 28' tall pylon; the setback dimension <br />is not stated, it is requested to be "in line with the adjacent <br />signs" of the neighboring car dealers. <br /> <br />We are unaware of any specific agreement that was made concerning <br />the proposed sign. In our opinion, the McCarthy si te does not <br />suffer from "complete visual obstruction", and the location of <br />neighboring business signs have been grandfathered in. If and <br />when they propose new signage they will need to comply with the <br />new standards. We believe there is no hardship in this case that <br />justifies a variance. <br /> <br />3. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />We recommend denial of the variance request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.