My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02505
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2500
>
pf_02505
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:55:40 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:48:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2505
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
Address
10 ROSEDALE CENTER
Applicant
COMPUTER CITY/BEECHWOOD ACQ
Status
APPROVED
PIN
122923140002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />HOISINGTON <br /> <br />TEL No.612-835-3160 <br /> <br />MaY 24.93 18:51 P.04 <br /> <br />~.. <br /> <br />--~~ -. ------------- --- <br /> <br />..-..-....-- .---. ... .. <br /> <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />Computer Oty/CmnrvadJ <br />May 2C, 1993 <br />Pap 3 <br /> <br />': <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />We strongly suggest an alternative (see Alternative Plan attached), not unlike the <br />preliminary concept developed by DSU, which places the buDding along the east <br />eelse of the Computer Oty site 80 that lts entry wID be an integral part of the <br />Crossroads Shopping Center. This will allow for traffic problems to be resolved at <br />the commol\ entrance while providing a much greater/ desree of coordination <br />between site elements. ThIs configuration, while still disruptive of views to <br />Crossroads, has a much lesser Impact on shopper. approaching the center from <br />County Road 82. <br /> <br />r'd.......' )foyttD"mt. <br /> <br />While there is not a great deal of pedestrian traffic in the vicinity of County Road B2 <br />and the Crossroads entrance, there I. pede8bian hazard potential which should be <br />resolved as part of this approval process. We Nmply express thIe 18 a concern but do <br />not believe it should be a major Issue. <br /> <br />Pinclb\p and COI\~lUAioNl <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />It appears to us, that there Is too much to be gained by coordinating plans between <br />Computer City and Crossroads to allow the Computer City facility to be built as <br />proposed. Once the Computer City fadUty Is constructed traffic problems will be <br />virtually unresolvable without major disruption to existing and proposed parking <br />lots and circulation. Furthermore, the two developments will continue to function <br />as independent entities when they have a great deal to gain by their integration, the <br />sharing of accesses and parking, <br /> <br />It is our opinion that it would be ill advised to approve the proposed Computer City <br />site plana because they are inconsistent with sound land planning principals. The <br />objecUve should D2l be to discourage or stop Computer City from utilizing the site <br />but Instead to develop a site plan that represents everyone's best interests. The <br />~urrent site plan does not meet or satisfy the beat interests of the City or the two <br />property owners. As presently proposed, this is a lose/lose proposition. <br /> <br />It would be our recommendation that a traffic study be completed for both sites, A <br />safe and functional circulation system wUl, in our opinion, demand the <br />reconfiguration of the subject Computer City buDding and 8ite, causng it to be an <br />integral part of the Crossroads complex. <br /> <br />HOISINGTON KOBGLBR GROUP INC. <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />f' <br /> <br />t" <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />>. <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />~':., <br /> <br /> <br />Fred L Hoisington, ~CP <br />President <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.