My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02536
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2500
>
pf_02536
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:56:33 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:49:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2536
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
2245 DALE ST N
Applicant
MCMAHON, WILLIAM
Status
APPROVED
PIN
112923440002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />/'10 <br />r-;'.J <br />:J <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 5-10-93 <br />ITEM NO.: 1) - ~. <br /> <br /> <br />nt Approval: <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />William McMahon request for a minor. variance <br />at 2245 N. Dale Street. <br /> <br />Backqround: <br /> <br />1. City ordinances require that accessory structures in <br />residential districts shall be located five feet or more from <br />all lot lines. <br /> <br />2. William McMahon is proposing to reconstruct an existing <br />garage to remove siding that is covered with lead based paint <br />and to expand the size of the garage. The existing garage <br />footings and foundation is 3 feet from the side property <br />line. This property line is also the right-of-way line for <br />Highway 36. <br /> <br />3. The Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommended approval <br />of the variance. The Committee believed it was reasonable to <br />use the existing garage foundation and floor for the new <br />garage especially in light of the fact that the garage backs <br />up to the Highway 36 right-of-way. certainly removing lead <br />based paint from the communi ty must be seen as a great <br />improvement. <br /> <br />5. All affected adjacent property owners indicated their <br />approval of the proposed variance. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the variance based on the finding that no hardship or <br />practical difficulties exist on the site. <br /> <br />2. Grant the variance based on the finding that a hardship or <br />practical difficulty is present on the site. <br /> <br />Policy Obiective: <br /> <br />1. To insure that development occurs consistent with the City's <br />zoning ordinances and comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />2. To grant variances where hardship and/or practical <br />difficulties exist. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.