My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02567
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2500
>
pf_02567
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:56:49 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:49:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2567
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
1911 DELLWOOD AVE
Applicant
KONSTANTINIDES, FRANK
Status
APPROVED
PIN
142923120033
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />jJ.6/P 1 <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 6-14-93 <br />ITEM NO.: ~ - 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Approval: <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda section: <br /> <br />~d <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Frank and Nancy Konstantinides request for <br />minor variances at 1911 Dellwood Avenue. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />1. ci ty ordinances require that driveways on corner lots be <br />setback 30 feet from street right-of-way. <br /> <br />2. During street reconstruction projects, it has been the City's <br />practice to bring driveways into compliance with code <br />requirements or have the property owner seek a variance. <br /> <br />3. The Konstantinides are seeking a 9 foot and a 5 foot variance <br />from the setback requirements from street right-of-ways to <br />allow their driveways to remain in their current locations. <br /> <br />4. The Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommended approval <br />of the variances. It was the Committee's belief that moving <br />the driveway would make access to the garage difficult and <br />would require removing mature trees. <br /> <br />5. All affected adjacent property owners indicated their <br />approval of the proposed variance. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the variance based on the finding that no hardship or <br />practical difficulties exist on the site. <br /> <br />2. Grant the variance based on the finding that a hardship or <br />practical difficulty is present on the site. <br /> <br />policv objective: <br /> <br />1. To insure that development occurs consistent with the city's <br />zoning ordinances and comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />2. To grant variances where hardship and/or practical <br />difficulties exist. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: <br /> <br />1. It is recommended that the City Council approve Frank and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.