My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0609_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0609_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 1:53:18 PM
Creation date
6/5/2014 1:38:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14' <br />14.> <br />14G <br />14' <br />148 <br />14 �: <br />15C; <br />15'' <br />15� <br />15:� <br />15-a <br />155 <br />15ei <br />157 <br />15� <br />15 v; <br />161; <br />16i <br />d. Buildings may be stepped with lower heights placed nearer lower density residential <br />use/district and greater heights being placed near roadways. <br />e. Minimum parking lot and/or garage setbacks for student housing uses in all allowed <br />districts shall be 10 feet, which area shall consist of landscaping, an opaque screen <br />fence, or a combination thereof. <br />5.9 Additional Residential Use Amendments <br />During the student housing review for University of Northwestern the Planning Division <br />determined that a few changes to the Neighborhood Business (NB) District regarding <br />housing should also accompany its portion of the proposed text amendments. <br />Specifically, the Planning Division views single family attached units as an appropriate <br />housing rype in the NB district as well as multi-family; 3-8 units. These are proposed as <br />conditional so as to mitigate any issues or concerns that could occur when adjacent low <br />density residential. The Division also felt that a mixed use project (multi-family upper <br />floors) was not an appropriate use type in the NB district given the assumed density <br />needed to support such a project; therefore are change is from permitted to not permitted. <br />Lastly, the Planning Division determined that an accessory dwelling unit, college or <br />post-secondary school, campus, and school, elementary or secondary were inappropriate <br />for the CMU and thus we are recommending them to be not permitted. <br />16r 5.10 Use Table; brining it all together <br />�s:�� In review of Table 1005-1, the Planning Division would suggest the following changes: <br />� 6� black strikeout to be eliminated and red bold, underline, to be added. <br />16 �i; <br />Table 1005-1 NB CB RB-1 RB-� CMU Standards <br />Commercial Uses <br />Liquor store C P P P P <br />Lodging: hotel, motel NP P P P P <br />Mini-storage NP P P P NP <br />Residential — Family Living <br />Dwelling, one-family attached <br />{�R C NP NP NP P <br />(townhome, rowhouse) — <br />Dwelling, multi-family (3-8 units per <br />A�RC NP NP NP P <br />building) <br />Dwelling, multi-family (upper stories in <br />� N P P �1-R P �1-R P P <br />mixed-use building) — <br />Dwelling, multi-family (8 or more units <br />C #R P A�R P A�R P P <br />per building) — <br />Dwelling unit, accessory NP NP NP NP 6 NP Y <br />Live-work unit C NP NP NP P Y <br />PF14-006 RCA 060914 final.doc <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.