My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0512
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0512
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2014 8:37:45 AM
Creation date
6/10/2014 9:35:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/12/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 12, 2014 <br /> Page 16 <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked that good drainage and grading plans be submit- <br /> ted, and encouraged the developers to consider working with residents on the his- <br /> torical elements and attempt to incorporate them into this development. <br /> Mayor Roe addressed the south lot line of Lot 3 (Attachment H)that gave his <br /> pause as the Subdivision Code called for it to be perpendicular with the road to <br /> ensure compliance, which staff duly noted. <br /> Recess <br /> Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 8:00 p.m. and reconvened at approximately <br /> 8:10 p.m. <br /> c. Authorize Project Packages for the Parks and Recreation Renewal Program <br /> Present were: Parks & Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke; Assistant Parks & <br /> Recreation Director Jill Anfang; Parks Superintendent Jeff Evenson; and LHB <br /> Design Consultant Michael Schroeder. <br /> Mr. Brokke noted that this had been and extensive and exhaustive community <br /> process; and thanked the City Council, participating staff, consultants, and resi- <br /> dents of the community for their participation. Mr. Brokke summarized each <br /> package, selected under the Beset Value Process and its six selection criteria as <br /> detailed in the RCA dated May 12, 2014. <br /> Package A—Buildings, Shelters and Site Work <br /> After Mr. Brokke's summary, Councilmember McGehee sought clarification on <br /> the process, and expressed her frustration with not having any drawings to outline <br /> this significant change in price and whether or not the suggestions originally made <br /> by the City Council had been incorporated into these plans. Councilmember <br /> McGehee noted that those suggestions included changes to improve maintenance, <br /> longevity and lower costs; and noted that the City Council had received no feed- <br /> back as to whether any of them were taken into consideration or involved in the <br /> proposals. <br /> Mr. Schroeder advised that several things had been identified and incorporated in- <br /> to the proposal packages. <br /> • In floor hearing: Mr. Schroeder advised that it was bid as an alternate, but <br /> found to be considerably more expensive and served to create a redundant <br /> package. <br /> • Building Technology: Mr. Schroeder advised that infrastructure would be <br /> provided in the buildings as amenities installed as funds become available; <br /> with raceways and conduits initially provided for future Wi-Fi service. <br /> Schroeder advised that the City would pursue remote monitoring of the main <br /> doors at each of the six buildings. <br /> • More durable exterior materials: Mr. Schroeder advised that after review of <br /> other exterior materials, and with the durability provided by fiber cement <br /> board as indicated by the industry trade, and much less expensive than brick <br /> or stone, it was determined to seek that material. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.