My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0512
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0512
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2014 8:37:45 AM
Creation date
6/10/2014 9:35:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/12/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 12,2014 <br /> Page 23 <br /> cilities deserved or expected by residents. Councilmember McGehee opined that <br /> she had yet to receive anything from staff on how these facilities will be staffed, <br /> since there was apparently going to be no remote opening or security in place; and <br /> further opined that utilizing bathrooms under that scenario would prove to be a se- <br /> rious liability for the City if staff wasn't there to monitor them, requiring others to <br /> be on site or security cameras in place. Councilmember McGehee opined that this <br /> part of the project should not be delayed, and if only $12 million of the $19 mil- <br /> lion bonded for this renewal program was being used, serious consideration was <br /> needed to make buildings the way they were intended during the planning pro- <br /> cess. <br /> While not sharing all the concerns expressed by Councilmember McGehee, <br /> Councilmember Laliberte shared the concern that if this type of building was be- <br /> ing made available, people should be able to access the facility. Councilmember <br /> Laliberte opined that in this day and age, access to Wi-Fi and being able to access <br /> and use a building was expected. <br /> Mr. Brokke clarified that the front door for each facility would have access im- <br /> mediately upon construction and when the building was opened; with remote ac- <br /> cess, and restrooms available and open during daylight hours. Regarding the Wi- <br /> Fi portion, Mr. Brokke advised that some funds were allotted in the CIP, and staff <br /> was still working with the City's IT Department to address the other buildings, <br /> with that information available in the near future for Council consideration. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus on the cost to provide Wi-Fi in today's <br /> dollars, Mr. Brokke advised that all electronic access and security was estimated <br /> to be between $60,000 and $70,000 for all buildings, including the Nature Center <br /> and Arboretum, and would be similar to the amenities provided at the new fire <br /> station, with security cameras as well, and important component from his perspec- <br /> tive. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte asked if there was a way to get an estimate for having <br /> Wi-Fi installed in all buildings on day one. <br /> Mr. Evenson noted that Mr. Brokke had mentioned the current review of options, <br /> including retrofitting buildings. Mr. Evenson advised that there would be an op- <br /> erable door handle for picnic shelter restrooms that could be programmed, wheth- <br /> er immediately by computer or not; with current cost estimates involving much it- <br /> eration and options, but no exact items listed at this point. Mr. Evenson advised <br /> that Wi-Fi for the public was a simple piece, with two levels: a base proposal, and <br /> then another proposal that would include that and two doors per building, or an- <br /> other proposal involving everything. At this point, Mr. Evenson advised that the <br /> middle ground was under consideration, but a conscious effort had been made to <br /> make sure restrooms were available to the public. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.