Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 12, 2014 <br /> Page 26 <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that she had spent considerable time to-date re- <br /> viewing options for this boardwalk: consulting with construction companies on <br /> materials, looking at other communities building boardwalks who were for the <br /> most part using synthetic materials since they don't splinter, have longer life <br /> spans, and don't rot, and their components were as easily replaced as pressure <br /> treated lumber. As stated with the buildings, Councilmember McGehee opined <br /> that an inferior product was proposed to save money, and treated lumber would <br /> still have splinters, still deteriorate, and while we think it's safe, opined that put- <br /> ting it in a bog area was not environmentally a good idea. Councilmember <br /> McGehee opined that she found this rather appalling, and if value added was giv- <br /> en for stainless steel screws, submitted that the RFP was not complete in the first <br /> place. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted that Ramsey County was currently installing a natu- <br /> ral board boardwalk along and under Highway 36 for Keller Lake Park. Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten clarified that the galvanized screws were not for the wood por- <br /> tion, but for the super structure, and the screw jacks would allow changes to the <br /> boardwalk being installed in the underlying natural environment. Councilmember <br /> Etten noted that the screws were for the whole structure, not just for the screws <br /> alone. <br /> For clarification purposes, Mayor Roe noted that the super structure and screws <br /> were proposed as galvanized, not stainless. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus; Laliberte; Etten; and Roe. <br /> Nays: McGehee. <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> Package Iā€”Stantec Consulting Services (Natural Resources) <br /> Etten moved, Willmus seconded, approval of entering into a contract with Stantec <br /> Consulting Services, Inc. for Package I (natural resources as outlined), in an <br /> amount not to exceed $1,500,000, as detailed in the RCA dated May 12, 2014; au- <br /> thorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the documents contingent upon <br /> final review and approval by the City Attorney. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she would not support his motion; opining <br /> that is should be rebid as it was not proper or ethical to have Stantec in the posi- <br /> tion they had in 2013 and yet bid on this project. From what she knew, Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee opined that Stantec was not the best selection based on the <br /> community's natural resource needs or their firm's resources to perform the job. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that she knew the other two firms also had ac- <br /> cess to grant, and were not consultants, but actually performed the work and had a <br /> long history of performing the natural resources work being asked for, opining <br /> that Stantec did not. Councilmember McGehee opined that the City was at fault <br />