My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02587
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2500
>
pf_02587
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:57:41 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:50:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2587
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
1874 DELLWOOD AVE
Applicant
TIERNEY, THOMAS
Status
APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />J6q1 <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 6-29-93 <br />ITEM NO.: "fJ-1 <br /> <br />Department Approval: <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda section: <br /> <br />E5 <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Thomas Tierney request for a minor variance at <br />1874 Dellwood Avenue. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />1. City ordinances require that sideyard setbacks for driveways <br />be 5 feet from the property line. <br /> <br />2. Mr. Tierney's home is located on a street that is currently <br />under reconstruction as part of the Pavement Management <br />Program. <br /> <br />3. Mr. Tierney would like to widen his driveway by 8-1/2 feet to <br />allow him to have a 2 car wide driveway. This would require <br />a 4 foot side yard variance. <br /> <br />4. The Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommended approval <br />of the variance. It was the Committee's belief that moving <br />the driveway further to the south would be impractical as it <br />would be placed directly in front of a large picture window <br />and that widening it by constructing it on the north side <br />would still leave inadequate space to the adjacent property. <br /> <br />5. All affected adjacent property owners indicated their <br />approval of the proposed variance. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the variance based on the finding that no hardship or <br />practical difficulties exist on the site. <br /> <br />2. Grant the variance based on the finding that a hardship or <br />practical difficulty is present on the site. <br /> <br />Policy Obiective: <br /> <br />1. To insure that development occurs consistent with the City's <br />zoning ordinances and comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />2. To grant variances where hardship and/or practical <br />difficulties exist. <br /> <br />staff Recommendation: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.