My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02596
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2500
>
pf_02596
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:58:05 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 11:50:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2596
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
1800 DUNLAP ST N
Applicant
SNELTJES, CRAIG
Status
APPROVED
PIN
152923440020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ sq [p <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 7-26-93 <br />ITEM NO.: E... + <br /> <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br /> <br />~& <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Craig and Heidi Snel tj es request for a minor <br />variance at 1800 N. Dunlap st. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />1. city ordinances require that the maximum driveway width in <br />the public right-of-way be no greater than 26 feet. <br /> <br />2. As part of the Pavement Management Program, Garden Avenue has <br />been widened and a sidewalk has been installed on the south <br />side of this street. The Sneltjes' garage is already quite <br />close to the property line and given the street widening and <br />sidewalk construction, their driveway is shortened to the <br />point where a car cannot be parked in front of the garage. <br />To provide an off street parking space that would not block <br />the sidewalk, the Public Works Department worked with the <br />Snel tj es to construct an asphal t slab to the west of the <br />existing driveway, extending from the house to the road. In <br />order to use the new parking area, the driveway width needs <br />to be 29 feet, thereby creating the need for a 3 foot <br />variance to the maximum driveway opening width. <br /> <br />3. The Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommended approval <br />of the variance. The Committee believed it was reasonable to <br />provide off-street parking that did not block the sidewalk. <br /> <br />4. All affected adjacent property owners indicated their <br />approval of the proposed variance. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the variance based on the finding that no hardship or <br />practical difficulties exist on the site. <br /> <br />2. Grant the variance based on the finding that a hardship or <br />practical difficulty is present on the site. <br /> <br />Policy Objectives: <br /> <br />1. To insure that development occurs consistent with the City's <br />zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />2. To grant variances where hardship andlor practical <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.