My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02609
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2600
>
pf_02609
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:58:30 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:12:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2609
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
1765 CHATSWORTH ST
Status
Approved
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />July 27,1993 <br /> <br />City of Roseville <br />Planning and Zoning <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br /> <br />Dear Minor Variance Committee: <br /> <br />We are applying for a two foot variance in order to build an attached garage within three <br />feet of the side lot line. We own and live in the home at 1765 Chatsworth Street North. <br />We purchased the property in August of 1992. It had been a non-homestead rental <br />property for many years. <br /> <br />Currently the property has no garage and a gravel driveway. A minor variance <br />was approved in June of 1989 to the previous owner (see attachment). This granted a two <br />foot variance for the driveway and street cut-out. We would like to continue the line of the <br />existing driveway into a new garage. <br /> <br />Our neighbors on that side (south) have no objections to our plan. We have shown them <br />where the building would be, if approved. Please see the attached letter from Clara <br />Laeffelmacher at 1757 Chatsworth St. N. indicating her approval. They have a chain link <br />fence on their lot, placed 1 foot in, so the proposed building would stand four feet from the <br />fence. <br /> <br />We have looked at many different options for placement of a garage on our property. By <br />attaching the garage to the side of the house we accomplish several things: <br /> <br />We could retain a beautiful maple tree that would have to come down if we placed a <br />garage in the back yard. The tree trunk is approximately 18" in diameter. <br /> <br />We would retain the open view of several adjacent yards, by not constructing out in <br />the back yard. We are located one house in from the corner of Roma and <br />Chatsworth so we are part of several backyards grouped together. <br /> <br />It would be far more expensive for us to build a garage in the back yard. The grade <br />drops several feet to the rear of the lot. It would be more expensive to construct a <br />concrete foundation/wall at the back of the garage. This would also be much uglier <br />for the neighbors and the garage would appear to be much higher. <br /> <br />We have planned the proposed garage to be set back ten feet from the front of our house. <br />This would reduce the look of plainness across houses and the feel of closeness (see <br />drawing). Also, the neighbors to the south have their garage on the north side of their <br />home. The proposed garage would therefor be next to their garage, and not obstruct any <br />view from their living space. <br /> <br />Thank you for your consideration on this matter. Please call if you would like any <br />additional information or to visit the property. <br /> <br />Sincerely: <br />~cJk <br /> <br />Randall C. Starr <br /> <br />/~~¿.~ <br /> <br /><"""'/"ßnn E. Starr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.