Laserfiche WebLink
<br />from the shore line. Also, underneath the above-grade deck was an <br />on-grade patio deck that was not and is not attached or affixed to <br /> <br />the structure in any way which extends from the walk-out basement <br />to within 15 feet of the lake shore. <br /> <br />3. In 1978, the defendant, City of Roseville (hereafter <br />"City") adopted a Shore land Management Ordinance (Chapter 18 of the <br /> <br />City Code) which: <br /> <br />a. Requires a setback from the shore line to the structure <br />of 75 feet. Section 18.100(2) (c). <br /> <br />b. Grandfathers in structures, such as the Kadrie home, and <br />use of shore lands which did not meet lot area, setbacks <br />or other dimension requirements of the ordinance when <br />adopted. Sections 18.240 and .250. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Refers to use of shore lands which <br />before adoption of the ordinance but <br />the minimum lot area, setbacks or <br />requirements of the ordinance as <br />Section 18.250. <br /> <br />are in existence <br />which do not meet <br />other dimensional <br />substandard uses. <br /> <br />d. Prohibits structural alteration or addition to a substan- <br />dard use which will increase the substandard dimension. <br />Id. <br /> <br />e. Provides that the existing city zoning code is adopted by <br />reference and shall apply if it imposes a greater <br />restriction. Section 18.050. <br /> <br />4. The zoning code of the city states that non-conforming <br /> <br />uses may continue but "may not be extended, expanded, [or] <br /> <br />intensified. <br /> <br />" <br />. . . <br /> <br />Section ll. 020 . <br /> <br />5. In August of 1988, plaintiff applied for and received a <br /> <br />shoreline permit to locate a family room addition between the house <br />and the garage which would not bring the structure any closer to <br /> <br />the shoreline. <br /> <br />2 <br />