My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02617
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2600
>
pf_02617
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 11:59:24 AM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:12:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2617
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
2202 ST CROIX ST
Applicant
MICK, CHARLES AND MARILYN
Status
APPROVED
PIN
082923340030
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />;JLÞ (1 <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 9-13-93 <br />ITEM NO. :B- ~ <br /> <br />vnt Approval. <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Charles and Marilyn Mick request for a minor <br />variance at 2202 st. Croix street <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />1. City ordinances require a 10 foot sideyard setback for <br />buildings in an R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. <br /> <br />2. The Mick' s are proposing to add living space and a double <br />garage to their house at 2202 st. Croix street by replacing <br />their attached breezeway and single car garage with a two story <br />addition, having a double garage and family room on the first <br />level and bedrooms and a bathroom on the second level. To <br />accomplish this, they are seeking a two foot sideyard setback <br />variance. <br /> <br />3. Mr. Mick explained that to achieve a reasonable floor plan and <br />to avoid changes to load bearing walls in the existing house, <br />a hallway must be included with the addition and that to <br />include the hallway with a 23 foot wide double garage, brought <br />the width of the addition to 27 feet. <br /> <br />4. The Minor Variance Committee reviewed this application and <br />agreed with Mr. Mick about the necessity for the 3-1/2 foot <br />wide hallway but asked if he could reduce the garage width to <br />22 feet. Mr. Mick agreed with this request and, based on this, <br />the Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommended approval <br />of the variance. The Committee believed the variance request <br />was reasonable in that 22 feet is a minimum size for a two car <br />garage and the Committee understood the need for the hallway <br />between the existing house and proposed addition. <br /> <br />5. All affected adjacent property owners indicated their approval <br />of the proposed variance. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the variance based on findings that no hardships or <br />practical difficulties exist on the site. <br /> <br />2. Grant the variance based on the finding that a hardship or <br />practical difficulty is present on the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.